This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:11:00
Alex Kidman reviews the Motorola Razer 40, a more affordable foldable phone in Australia priced at 999 AUD. Compared to the higher-end Razer 40 Ultra (Razer Plus in other markets), the Razer 40 lacks certain premium features such as a versatile external display and higher brightness on the internal display. The phone's faux leather design, available in multiple colors, and its IP52 dust protection rating are highlighted, although the phone offers limited water resistance. Camera specifications include a 64-megapixel primary lens and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide and macro lens, with a 32-megapixel sensor on the front. Despite high megapixel counts, the camera's performance is deemed unremarkable.
The Razer 40 is evaluated against other smartphones in its price range, such as Google’s Pixel 7 and 7A, and Motorola's own ThinkPhone. Criticisms include its mediocre camera quality, Snapdragon 7 gen 1 processor, and overall performance which pales in comparison to competitors. Practical features like a quick flashlight activation gesture and better-than-average battery life with a 4200mAh battery are noted.
The video discusses the phone’s battery performance and charging, mentioning its 97% battery retention and 33-watt charging capability with an included USB-C port. Wireless charging remains slow at 5 watts. Despite offering good value, alternative options like the Z Flip 4 might be more appealing for those seeking higher speed. Price drops within six months could position the Razer 40 as a better mid-range option. The reviewer recommends considering the Razer 40 Ultra if the budget allows, inviting viewer engagement and comments.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, Alex Kidman reviews the Motorola Razer 40, the more affordable foldable phone model in Australia, priced at 999 AUD. Alex explains that while the Razer 40 is cheaper, it lacks some of the premium features of the Razer 40 Ultra — known as the Razer Plus in other markets. He highlights the differences in design, noting that the Razer 40 has a simpler 1.5-inch external OLED display and a 6.9-inch internal display, which is somewhat similar but less bright compared to the Razer 40 Ultra. While the external display is only useful for basic notifications, Alex suggests it doesn’t excite him as much as the more functional screen on the Razer 40 Ultra. He also mentions color options available in Australia, which include vanilla cream, summer lilac, and sage green, noting his personal dislike for the faux leather feel. Overall, he seems to prefer the Razer 40 Ultra due to its more versatile external display and better overall functionality.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses the design, durability, and camera specifications of the Razer 40 smartphone, highlighting several key points. The off-white faux leather cover may become stained over time, though the folding mechanism retains its crease but is generally unnoticeable during daily use unless actively remarked upon. Comparatively, the Razer 40 has an IP52 rating, offering better protection against dust than Samsung’s IPX8-rated flip phones, though it is less resistant to water immersion. The Razer 40 features dual rear lenses: a 64-megapixel primary and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide and macro lens, along with a 32-megapixel front sensor. Despite having higher megapixel counts, the camera performance is deemed acceptable but not particularly exciting, especially when compared to the Razer 40 Ultra, which has a more light-sensitive primary sensor.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the presenter evaluates the Motorola Razer 40, comparing it to other smartphones in the $999 price range, such as Google’s Pixel phones. The main criticisms include its camera quality, which is deemed only mediocre compared to the Pixel 7 and 7A, and its internal hardware featuring the lower-grade Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 gen 1. While this configuration includes 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage and runs a clean Android UI, it falls short in performance compared to other phones in its price range, including Motorola’s own ThinkPhone and the Pixel 7A. Notably, the Razer 40 offers practical features like a quick flashlight activation gesture, but its overall speed and power handling leave much to be desired. The phone is identified as an entry-level premium device, but it fails to meet higher performance expectations. However, the Razer 40 does have a slightly better battery life than similar flip phones from Samsung, with a 4200mAh battery that performs better in tests.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the battery performance and charging capabilities of the Razer 40 phone. They highlight that the Razer 40 retains 97% of its battery, which is a strong performance, surpassed only by its predecessor, the Razer 2022. For recharging, the phone uses a USB-C port with a 33-watt charger included, although it supports up to 30 watts of charging. It also has wireless charging capabilities but only at 5 watts, which is slow by 2023 standards.
The speaker then debates whether the Razer 40 is worth purchasing, suggesting the Razer 40 Ultra as a preferable option if budget allows. They note that while the Razer 40 offers good value, similarly priced alternatives like the Z Flip 4 might be faster. They also mention that the Razer 40’s price may drop significantly within six months, making it a better mid-range option. The speaker concludes by inviting viewers to share their preferences in the comments and encourages them to like and subscribe.