The summary of ‘Why are AMD AND INTEL using CHIPLETS (Tiles)??’

This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.

00:00:0000:10:57

The video discusses Intel's new Meteor Lake architecture focusing on a shift towards tile and chiplet structures, highlighting differences in AMD and Intel's modular designs. It explains how the die size impacts chip yields, with AMD achieving higher efficiency due to smaller core dies. The modularity of CPU dies is explored, showcasing how Intel and AMD optimize chip production efficiency by leveraging different process nodes. The importance of chiplets for customizable chip designs and performance optimization is emphasized, noting Intel's use of multiple process nodes. Overall, the video emphasizes the shift towards modular and customizable CPU designs to enhance performance, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in chip production.

00:00:00

In this part of the video, Intel’s new meteor Lake architecture is discussed, which represents a significant shift in CPU design with a move towards tile and chiplet structures. Both AMD and Intel have adopted modular designs, but with distinct implementations. AMD uses multiple dies mounted to the PCB with modularity based on the specific die configurations. This approach offers cost and complexity benefits but may increase signal latency and data integrity issues. In contrast, Intel’s approach involves mounting modular components on top of a monolithic chip, allowing for closer proximity of components like the memory controller to reduce latency. Intel’s method is more complex and expensive but offers potential performance advantages in memory access.

00:03:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the process of making CPUs and how the size of the die impacts chip yields. The process involves etching the CPU design into a wafer multiple times to create individual dies. Larger designs result in fewer usable chips due to defects, which can lead to partial or complete failures. The speaker compares Intel’s large monolithic die to AMD’s smaller core dies, showing that AMD achieves significantly higher yields, nearly four times more than Intel, due to its smaller die size. This size difference provides AMD with a significant advantage in chip production efficiency.

00:06:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the modularity of CPU dies and how it can benefit performance and cost efficiency. They explain that CPUs can now be made with multiple dies using different processes, sizes, and companies. Intel’s Meteor Lake chips, for example, utilize four different process nodes from both Intel and TSMC for various components like core die, IGPU, SOC, and I/O die. This approach allows for more efficient production by leveraging different process nodes based on performance requirements, maximizing chip output and reducing costs. The video also highlights AMD’s customization of chips like the Ryzen 7000 X 3D series by mixing and matching 3DV cache with regular dies without the need for a complete chip redesign. This modularity trend is beneficial for both AMD and Intel as it enables more customized and cost-effective chip production.

00:09:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses how chiplets are being used to customize presentations for various packages, including different core configurations. Intel benefits from using multiple process nodes, optimizing performance and power. Chiplets are now the standard as they allow greater flexibility in chip design. The speaker invites viewers to subscribe for more content and encourages feedback on the topic. Additional information and support options are mentioned, including Patreon, merchandise, and personal hardware tools available in the video description.

Scroll to Top