This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:21:38
The video recounts the tragic murder of Dana Satterfield in her salon, with the motive suspected to be sexually related. Initial investigations pointed towards her estranged husband, Mike Satterfield, due to fingerprint evidence and their troubled relationship. However, DNA evidence didn't match. The case remained unsolved until ten years later when new leads surfaced, eventually leading to the arrest of Jonathan Vick, who was found guilty of Dana's murder based on DNA evidence. Vick had a history of instability and brushes with the law. The video discusses the emotional impact on the victim's family, the prosecution of Jonathan Vick, and the lingering doubts surrounding other potential suspects, emphasizing the complexity of the case.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, a hairdresser is attacked in her salon, resulting in her murder by hanging. The motive is believed to be sexually related as the robbery was not the motive. The victim, Dana Satterfield, was a mother of two. The murder occurred around 8:30 when the salon was still open, despite no scheduled appointments. A witness described the attacker as white, approximately 5’9″ tall, wearing jeans and a gray t-shirt. The case goes cold until an auto mechanic provides crucial information, reigniting the investigation.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, a police artist created a composite sketch of a suspect and another witness reported seeing a suspicious vehicle in a particular area. The police found a clear fingerprint on the water heater where the victim’s body was found, indicating a possible connection to the killer. The fingerprint matched the victim’s estranged husband, Mike Satterfield, raising suspicions. The investigators believed the killer likely knew the victim and the crime was personal and vicious. The autopsy revealed the cause of death as strangulation and evidence of sexual assault. The investigators focused on the crime scene, particularly the bathroom where important evidence was found. The husband had been living separately from the victim and had a problematic relationship with her.
00:06:00
In this segment of the video, Mike Satterfield’s children share that they were with him the night of the murder, and they knew he had no involvement. Mike’s prints were at the crime scene due to repair work he had done there. Investigators pursued other fingerprints found, including one in Dana’s blood, but did not find any matches in the statewide database. The search for the mysterious white-and-blue Ford Bronco was unfruitful. A break in the case came when a prison inmate reported that his cellmate, Russell Trevor Quinn, often talked about Dana Satterfield. Quinn’s interest in Dana led to suspicions, as he was already incarcerated for a crime.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, a suspect named Russell Trevor Quinn was initially identified as a potential match for Dana’s murder based on eyewitness descriptions and past criminal history. Despite being a promising lead, Quinn’s DNA did not match the evidence from the crime scene. The case remained unsolved for ten years until Dana’s daughter helped reignite the investigation. Detectives Gregory and Smith worked tirelessly over the years, following numerous leads. Ashley Satterfield, Dana’s daughter, unintentionally sparked a breakthrough in the case when a mechanic recognized her as the victim’s daughter, leading to a new avenue of investigation.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, it is discussed how 10 years earlier, a friend named Jonothan Vick showed interest in Dana Satterfield and spoke about her to another person. This person later called the police anonymously after Dana’s murder, mentioning his conversation with Jonothan Vick and indicating Vick was seen driving a white Ford Bronco. Despite police questioning and attempts to obtain DNA, the investigation on Vick was dropped due to insufficient probable cause. The narrator emphasizes that despite this, doubts remained about Vick’s involvement in the crime.
00:15:00
In this segment of the video, a witness came forward after 10 years with information about the murder of Dana Satterfield. The witness claimed that Jonathan Vick, 17 years old at the time, had offered him a ride home from school and then went to Dana’s salon where he made a sexual advance that led to the attack and murder of Dana. The witness was able to provide a composite sketch of Vick, which closely resembled him. Despite the lack of fingerprints in the salon, investigators explained that it doesn’t always mean someone did not touch something. The witness waited to come forward out of fear, as Vick had threatened to kill him if he spoke to the police.
00:18:00
In this segment of the video, Michael Pace played a crucial role in obtaining Jonathan Vick’s DNA, which ultimately led to his arrest for Dana Satterfield’s murder. Jonathan Vick had a history of job instability and brushes with the law. Despite denying any involvement in the murder, his DNA was a 900-million-to-1 match with evidence from the crime scene. Investigators suspect that Satterfield might have been Vick’s first victim, with another acquaintance, Heather Renee Sellars, mysteriously disappearing later. Sellars’ case remains unsolved. Jonathan Vick was convicted of Dana Satterfield’s murder and sentenced to life in prison, with the jury unanimously finding him guilty.
00:21:00
In this segment of the video, the judge sentences someone to life in prison. The speaker expresses no sympathy for the individual or their family who still believe in the person’s innocence despite knowing their guilt. The speaker criticizes the individual as a pathological liar but acknowledges they received a fair trial.