This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:14:13
The video provides an in-depth comparison between two robotic vacuum models: the RoboRock S7 Max Ultra and the Q Revo, including their predecessors S7 Max V Ultra. It analyzes their features, performances, and overall user experience. Important points include:
1. **Comparison of Features and Specifications**:
– **S7 Max Ultra**: Priced at $1,400, features a new bristle side spinning brush, fewer sensors including removed RGB camera, fewer cliff sensors, a built-in dryer for the mop, and a free-floating brush roller housing. Notable for its powerful vacuum motor, integrated larger water tank, and vibrating mopping pad.
– **Q Revo**: Cheaper than S7 Max Ultra (<$1,000), has larger water tanks but uses more water, removable dock sink, spinning mopping pads, and simpler, more user-friendly design. It includes a significant removable mopping plate system and a quicker mopping pad drying feature.
2. **Performance Tests**:
– **Mopping Test**: Both models performed well, but the Q Revo left slight residue in a single pass.
– **Vacuum Test**: On tile floors and carpet, both models showed near-identical performance, with S7 Max Ultra slightly outperforming in terms of precision.
– **Object Avoidance**: Both models were similarly less effective in this area.
3. **Practical Use and Efficiency**:
– **Water Usage**: S7 Max Ultra uses less water and cleaning solution but requires more manual cleaning of filters and dock base. Q Revo uses more water but is more efficient in self-cleaning.
– **Noise and Power Consumption**: Q Revo registers slightly less noise and power usage.
– **Convenience**: Q Revo features a more straightforward design for maintenance, while S7 Max Ultra's integrated larger water tank makes it suitable for larger homes.
4. **Conclusions**:
– The presenter prefers the Q Revo's user-friendly design and cost-effectiveness, despite the S7 Max Ultra's superior water control. The video concludes that the choice depends on user needs, with the S7 Max Ultra better suited for extensive cleaning tasks due to its advanced features, while the Q Revo remains a disruptive, budget-friendly option in the market.
00:00:00
In this segment, the video discusses the release of RoboRock’s S7 Max Ultra, which followed the launch of the S8 series and compares it with the older S7 Max V Ultra and the Q Revo. The S7 Max Ultra is priced at $1,400 and is available in white or black. Key changes include the removal of the RGB camera and additional sensors, leading to less effective obstacle avoidance compared to the S7 Max V Ultra. The S7 Max Ultra also has fewer cliff sensors and introduces a new style bristle side spinning brush. The mopping system remains the same but lacks the detachable mopping plate feature. The integrated 200ml water tank is unchanged, and the multi-function LED light has been removed.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the speaker highlights the differences and upgrades between two robot vacuum models: the newer S7 Max Ultra and the older S7 Max V Ultra. Key improvements include a stronger vacuum motor, a built-in dryer for the mop, a revised dock drain filter, and an improved self-cleaning system. The speaker also compares the S7 Max Ultra with the Q Revo, noting similarities such as reactive object avoidance systems and the same vacuum motor, but differences in the mopping systems, water tank sizes, and dock designs. The S7 Max Ultra features a vibrating mopping pad and a larger onboard water tank, whereas the Q Revo uses spinning mopping pads and has a smaller water tank. The S7 Max Ultra also boasts a free-floating brush roller housing and more advanced dock features.
00:06:00
In this segment of the video, the reviewer conducts a series of tests comparing two robotic mops. The mopping test involved using baked-on hot sauce on tile floors, where both robots used room temperature water without detergent in deep plus mopping mode. Both robots performed impressively, with the Q Revo slightly behind due to leaving some residue after a single pass.
Next, in the vacuum test on tile floor with 130 grams of cat litter, both robots performed similarly in Max Plus vacuum mode, with the S7 Max slightly outperforming the Q Revo by picking up one extra gram.
In the carpet test, where 54 grams of rice was scattered on medium pile carpet, both vacuums picked up 52 grams, showing top-tier performance.
For the object avoidance test, both robots, using the same system, performed nearly identically but were not very effective at detecting and avoiding objects.
Comparing the ability to mop on hard floor surfaces, the Q Revo claims to lift its mopping pads higher than the S7 Max, but practically, both performed similarly on low to medium pile carpets. Finally, the reviewer measured water consumption, noting that while the Q Revo has larger water tanks than the S7 Max, the performance difference was negligible.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the presenter compares the S7 Max and Q Revo robots’ water usage, self-cleaning features, noise levels, and power consumption. The S7 Max used 550 milliliters of clean water and retrieved 500 milliliters of dirty water, indicating it used 50 milliliters for mopping. In contrast, the Q Revo used 910 milliliters of clean water and recaptured 775 milliliters, using 135 milliliters during mopping. Both models utilized roughly 18% of their water tank capacity, but the Q Revo’s larger tanks mean more detergent usage.
The noise and power consumption comparisons showed the Q Revo uses slightly less power. Both robots passed the auto-empty test efficiently, but the Q Revo dried the mopping pads faster and more completely than the S7 Max.
The presenter criticized the S7 Max’s self-cleaning feature as misleading, requiring manual cleaning of the filter and dock base, whereas the Q Revo only needs its tray rinsed, making it more user-friendly. Ultimately, the presenter preferred the simpler design of the Q Revo, despite the S7 Max using less water and cleaning solution.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker compares the Q Revo and the S7 Max Ultra robot vacuums. Key points include the Q Revo’s charging contacts, which do not require it to back off the dock and flip around like the S7 Max when switching between tasks. The Q Revo’s removable dock sink is highlighted as easier to clean. The Q Revo can output a significant amount of water while mopping and features a removable mopping plate system. The S7 Max Ultra is praised for its tight water control, wider mopping pad for baseboard cleaning, and a larger integrated water tank, making it suitable for large homes. It builds on a reliable design and includes the latest ultra dock upgrades. The Q Revo, priced below $1,000, is deemed disruptive to the robot vacuum market, offering many of the expensive S7 Max Ultra’s features. The segment concludes with a call to subscribe for support and thanks viewers.