This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:13:55
The video discusses comparisons between various fragrance clones and their original counterparts, focusing on key elements like notes, longevity, accuracy, and performance. Specific fragrances mentioned include Louis Vuitton L'Immensité, Gene Loe Immortal, La Mitesse, and Aventus clones. The speaker emphasizes the differences in notes, strength, and behavior between the originals and their clones, with comparisons based on personal preferences for scent elements. Pricing, accuracy levels, and performance differences are highlighted, with the clones offering a more affordable alternative but generally having lower longevity and projection compared to the originals. Viewers are encouraged to engage by sharing their opinions on fragrance accuracy and performance, and subscribing to the channel for more content.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, Jamar gives his final thoughts on the fragrance Impression by Flavia and compares it to Louis Vuitton L’Immensité and Gene Loe Immortal. He finds that Impression is closer to L’Immensité than Gene Loe Immortal, with an emphasis on ginger and grapefruit notes. He estimates Impression to be about 90 to 95 percent close to L’Immensité, noting differences in the watery, tea-like aspect and the presence of grapefruit, sage, and rosemary in the fragrance.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the impressions and differences between two fragrances, Louis Vuitton and a clone called Gene Low Immortal. The clone is described as projecting stronger than Louis Vuitton, with a heavy emphasis on a ginger note that persists throughout the fragrance. While the clone may not be as accurate as Louis Vuitton, it is closer in behavior, not as strong, but retaining a watery and softer touch. In the dry down, the clone presents a heavy dose of geranium and ambroxen notes.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the focus is on comparing two fragrances: La Mitesse and a clone. The speaker describes the differences in the dry down notes, emphasizing the Amber and Ambroxin tones in each scent. They discuss the strength and longevity of the clone compared to the original La Mitesse. The speaker suggests choosing between the two based on personal preference for specific scent elements like herbal, spicy, or strong notes. They also mention that the clone is more accurate to the original fragrance from a Middle Eastern house, but suggest trying other clones for comparison.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the pricing and performance of a cheaper alternative to a Louis Vuitton fragrance. They compare the accuracy and performance of the cheaper option to the original scent. The cheaper alternative is rated around 90% accurate in terms of similarity. The speaker also mentions the performance of both fragrances, with the Louis Vuitton lasting longer and projecting stronger than the cheaper alternative. They note that the cheaper alternative provides about 8 hours of performance on their skin. The speaker addresses some potential concerns regarding the longevity of the cheaper fragrance, stating they consistently get 8 hours of performance.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses two fragrance clones, highlighting their price difference and performance. They mention the Gene Lure Immortal as a beast mode version and the Limpression as a softer, more accurate clone of Aventus. The speaker invites viewers to share their opinions on the fragrances’ accuracy and asks for feedback in the comments. They also encourage new viewers to subscribe to the channel.