The summary of ‘mobile game tier list’

00:00:00

In this part of the video, the hosts are rating classic mobile games, starting with Jetpack Joyride, which they enthusiastically place in the S tier due to its engaging gameplay and significant time investment. They then discuss Cookie Clicker, delving into its deeper mechanics and humorous in-game scenarios, ultimately also rating it as S tier. The conversation is interspersed with lighthearted banter, including a playful mention of a fictional illness and a plug for new merchandise. The segment concludes with brief remarks on Star Wars Angry Birds, highlighting its unique features compared to the original Angry Birds game.

00:03:00

In this part of the video, the group engages in a casual discussion, quickly switching topics from geometric shapes and mobile device distractions to comparing various mobile games. They argue about the merits of “Angry Birds Star Wars,” eventually placing it in B tier due to general consensus. They discuss “Doodle Jump,” acknowledging its historical significance but decide it belongs in A tier. The group expresses mixed feelings about “Subway Surfers,” considering its long-term popularity but differing on its current relevance, tentatively placing it between A and B tier. Finally, they agree on “Plants vs. Zombies” as S tier for its comprehensive gameplay and memorable elements.

00:06:00

In this part of the video, the discussion revolves around ranking various games, specifically “Pokemon Go” and “Flappy Bird.” “Pokemon Go” receives mixed opinions; it’s noted for initially encouraging outdoor activities but criticized for various reasons including its decline in popularity. “Flappy Bird” is remembered for its high difficulty and the subsequent hate the creator received, leading to the game being removed despite its profitability. The discussion touches on ranking these games, the personal experiences of the participants, and some humorous interjections about other people’s continued interest in the games.

00:09:00

In this part of the video, the group discusses a game called “Singing Monsters,” expressing surprise and amusement at its concept of singing monsters. They attempt to create their own unique sounds imitating the game’s monsters, blending them together in a humorous, orchestrated effort. The conversation shifts to the game “Cut the Rope,” where opinions vary; some find it initially enjoyable but eventually frustrating and mentally taxing. They debate its ranking compared to other games like Pokemon Go and Flappy Bird. The segment concludes with a brief mention of “Minecraft Pocket Edition,” with one person expressing dislike for it.

00:12:00

In this segment of the video, the discussion revolves around comparing different mobile games, including Minecraft Pocket Edition, Scribblenauts, and others. They debate whether Minecraft Pocket Edition (PE) offers a comprehensive experience compared to its PC counterpart, highlighting differences like the absence of Redstone and control issues. The conversation transitions into a fond recollection of Scribblenauts, praising its creativity and flexibility in allowing players to spawn almost any object by typing its name. A tier ranking for various games is also discussed, with Scribblenauts being rated highly (S tier) due to its significant nostalgic value, while other games like Pokémon Go and Doodle Jump receive lower rankings. The segment emphasizes personal preferences and nostalgic connections to these games.

00:15:00

In this segment, the video creators discuss and rank several mobile games. They express mixed feelings about “Temple Run,” agreeing to place it at a C rating due to its repetitive nature. There’s a heated debate about ranking “Angry Birds Star Wars,” ending with a consensus on a C rating despite one person arguing for a higher placement. “Among Us” is appreciated for the positive impact on their career, ultimately ranked at S. They also discuss “Angry Birds Space,” agreeing on a C rating, considering it not better than “Angry Birds Star Wars.” Finally, there’s a brief mention of “Clash of Clans,” highlighting significant time spent on the game.

00:18:00

In this part of the video, the participants are discussing and debating the merits of various mobile games. They argue about “Clash of Clans,” with some thinking it is overrated, while others appreciate its features like building bases, raiding others, and its animated videos. There’s a humorous mention of “hog riders” and the game’s intricate lore. The discussion then moves to “Goat Simulator,” where one person defends its uniqueness and fun, such as being a goat with a jetpack, while others argue it becomes boring quickly. The group also touches upon “Bad Piggies,” describing it as a game where you create vehicles to traverse levels, though opinions on its quality are split.

00:21:00

In this part of the video, the participants discuss various mobile games, ranking them based on personal opinions and nostalgic value. The game initially compared to Pokémon Go is debated, with some feeling nostalgia is clouding judgment, ultimately ranking it as a ‘C’. They consider Fruit Ninja, likening its brief entertainment to Doodle Jump, and rank it around ‘B’ or ‘A’. Bloons Tower Defense 6 is highly praised for its strategy and labeled as an ‘S’ tier game. The competitive variation, Bloons Tower Defense Battles, is also discussed, initially ranked as ‘S,’ but then adjusted to ‘A’ due to strategic complexity. They also briefly mention Crossy Road, ultimately deciding it belongs in the ‘D’ tier.

00:24:00

In this segment, the discussion focuses on ranking various games. The first game mentioned is Clash Royale, which is described as a head-to-head strategy game similar to Clash of Clans, involving placing towers and creating strategies. While one person is unfamiliar with Clash of Clans, it’s noted that Clash Royale is often considered “pay to win.” The consensus ranks it at a C or D. The final game discussed is categorized under ‘S’ but debated to be an ‘A,’ involving an addictive gameplay experience with a character that bounces to music. Despite different opinions, the group concludes the game deserves an ‘A’ ranking.