This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:16:13
The video provides an extensive comparison between Google Assistant and Samsung's voice assistant (referred to as Samsung XP and Bixby) using the latest flagship devices, the Pixel 3 XL and Galaxy S10 Plus, respectively. Through various tests, including simple commands, location-based navigation, timers, alarms, and smart device control, Google Assistant consistently outperforms Bixby. Google Assistant handles complex commands, multitasking, and integration with other services such as Google Maps and Google Home more effectively. In contrast, Bixby struggles with certain commands, often requiring specific instructions or misunderstandings. The video ends with a recommendation to use Google Assistant on Samsung devices for a smarter, more reliable voice assistant experience.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, the presenter makes a comparison between Google Assistant and Samsung’s XP using the latest flagship devices from each company—the Pixel 3 XL for Google Assistant and the Galaxy S10 Plus for Samsung XP. The comparison begins with simple commands and becomes progressively more complex. Both assistants correctly respond to basic questions like converting inches to centimeters. When instructing the devices to take a selfie, both perform adequately, but issues arise when taking a photo with the back camera; Samsung XP does not switch from the selfie camera without specific direction. Additionally, when asked to take a selfie with a 10-second timer, Google Assistant accurately sets the timer, whereas Samsung XP ignores the specified time. The presenter concludes that Google Assistant performs better in handling these commands.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the presenter demonstrates the effectiveness of location-based commands using Google Maps and Bixby on different devices. The presenter reveals that they have both their home and work addresses saved in Google Maps and Bixby, which allows them to test navigation commands. When asking Google Assistant to “take me to work,” it correctly starts the navigation. However, when the same command is given to Bixby, it fails to understand multiple times. Additionally, Google Assistant successfully shows the nearest supermarkets and navigates to the nearest supermarket accurately, whereas Bixby fails to understand the command or provides incorrect web search results. The presenter concludes by testing a more complex command with Google Assistant, asking it to set a reminder to buy milk when at a supermarket, which Google Assistant handles successfully.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the speaker compares the functionality of Google Assistant and Samsung’s assistant through various voice commands. They find Google Assistant more intuitive, especially in location-based reminders, where Samsung’s assistant fails to link reminders to specific locations. The speaker then tests timer and alarm commands, noting that both assistants can set timers, but Google Assistant lacks voice feedback notification during setup, whereas Samsung’s assistant requires manual setting for alarms when using non-specific time commands. Finally, reminder commands demonstrate Google Assistant’s superior capability in interpreting and setting reminders accurately.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the speaker demonstrates setting reminders and comparing the functionality between Bixby and Google Assistant. They attempt to set a reminder on Bixby, but encounter issues with time interval commands, finding that Bixby requires precise time specifications. The speaker then tests reminder recall functionality, noting that while Bixby does remember the location of keys when asked, it still underperforms compared to Google Assistant. They highlight how Google Assistant handles smart device control, showing successful commands to turn on and off office lights via the Google Home app, whereas Bixby required additional clarification. This segment emphasizes Google Assistant’s superior performance in understanding and executing commands.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker compares the performance of Google Assistant and Samsung’s voice assistant by giving them two simultaneous commands: turning on office lights and setting a 10-second timer. Google Assistant successfully performed both tasks simultaneously, highlighting its capability to handle multiple commands effectively, which the speaker finds useful in various situations. Conversely, Samsung’s assistant struggled to execute both commands correctly, only setting the timer and misunderstanding the command about the lights. The speaker concludes that Google Assistant is noticeably more advanced. Additionally, they test the voice assistants’ ability to download an app from the Play Store. Google Assistant directs the user to the install button, simplifying the download process, while Samsung’s assistant fails to understand the command.
00:15:00
In this part of the video, the speaker compares Google Assistant and Samsung’s voice assistant in executing commands related to playing 4K videos on YouTube. Google Assistant performs the task accurately, while Samsung’s assistant fails to understand the command. The speaker concludes that Google Assistant is smarter and suggests using it on Samsung Galaxy devices by holding the home button or using third-party apps to remap the assistant button. The segment ends with the speaker encouraging viewers to like the video and subscribe for more content.