The summary of ‘ASUS breaks your ROG Ally if you don't pay $200 for warranty repairs: SCAMMING COMPANY!’

This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.

00:00:0000:08:16

The video discusses how Asus is allegedly violating the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act by unfairly denying warranty claims, using reasons like scratches or marks as excuses. The creator highlights cases of warranty denials for joystick faults and SSD removal, calling out Asus for questionable practices. There are calls for increased FTC scrutiny and a boycott of Asus products due to declining quality and fraudulent practices. Viewers are encouraged to report warranty issues to the FTC to combat such unfair treatment and emphasize consumer empowerment in holding companies accountable.

00:00:00

In this part of the video, the content creator discusses how Asus is allegedly violating the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act by unfairly denying warranty claims. The Act states that the burden of proof lies with the manufacturer to show that the consumer caused the issue, not simply because of actions like replacing a battery. Companies often wrongly void warranties for reasons like using third-party services or opening a device. The video highlights a case where Asus denied a warranty claim for a faulty joystick citing a scratch, raising questions about the durability of modern joysticks. The creator calls for increased scrutiny and enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission to hold such companies accountable for their actions.

00:03:00

In this segment of the video, the narrator discusses a situation where a customer’s SSD needs to be removed from the device by a service provider. ASUS uses marks left during the process as an excuse to not honor the warranty, even though the design flaw is from ASUS themselves. This practice is likened to a pseudo warranty void sticker and is technically compliant with the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. ASUS stipulates that customers must respond within 3 days to pay for out-of-warranty repairs; otherwise, they’ll receive their device disassembled and unusable. This practice is criticized as blackmail and an abuse of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. The narrator contrasts this with their own business practice where they return devices to customers intact, highlighting the unfair treatment by ASUS.

00:06:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker is calling for a boycott of Asus products due to a decline in quality and alleged fraudulent practices. They urge viewers to report any issues or warranty problems with Asus products to the FTC at report fraud.ftc.gov. The speaker emphasizes the importance of speaking up and taking action, highlighting that even a small percentage of viewers reporting fraud could have a significant impact. They criticize Asus for questionable warranty practices and emphasize the need for consumers to stand up against such practices.

Scroll to Top