This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:12:13
The video comprehensively reviews the New Balance Rebel V4 running shoes, focusing on their design, performance, and suitability for different types of runners. Zach highlights the intricate TPU weaving in the upper for durability but notes potential issues with the thin laces and eyelets and the need for a break-in period to address heel slippage due to the low ankle collar. The midsole, composed of PEB foam without a shank, offers a soft, comfortable feel but less bounce, especially for rear foot strikers. The lightweight construction shows minimal wear over time, and the outsole displays surprising abrasion resistance. The shoe performs well for lightweight, efficient runners with a consistent midfoot or rearfoot strike but may lack support for heavier runners or beginners transitioning to forefoot striking. Fit recommendations and potential enhancements with low-profile orthotics are discussed to optimize performance and longevity. The Rebel V4 is praised for its stability and suitability for midfoot strikers, with a final comparison to Nike Vomero 17 for context.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, Zach reviews the New Balance Rebel V4 running shoes. He appreciates the intricate TPU weaving in the upper, noting its durability while pointing out that the thin laces and eyelets might require users to switch to similarly thin laces if needed. The tongue of the shoe is minimal but breathable, with an elastic gusset for better fit and ventilation. However, the upper’s durability is compromised when subjected to abrasion. Zach mentions potential heel slippage due to the low ankle collar, which can be mitigated with a runner’s knot and some break-in period. He also discusses the midsole, describing it as a large scoop of PEB foam without a shank, which impacts its overall bounce and shape.
00:03:00
In this part, the speaker discusses the differences in the foam and stack between the rear foot and forefoot, emphasizing that the rear foot lacks solid support, leading to a softer feel but less performance feedback compared to the forefoot. The midsole is highlighted for its soft and comfortable nature but lacks liveliness when bearing body weight. The outsole’s design features some landing pads for rear foot strikers and displays surprising abrasion resistance despite thin rubber. The shoes are noted for their lightweight construction and minimal wear over time. The speaker suggests these shoes are best suited for light runners with strong, lean legs and a fast strike, as they may benefit from the compression and rebound of the foam.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the performance and fit of the Rebel V4 running shoes. They mention that heavier runners might experience less Snapback, but if a runner has the right stride and cadence, the shoes perform quickly. The grip test showed consistency with other shoes in its class, offering decent traction on slick or dry surfaces. The shoe’s fit is described as generous, with recommendations for sizing adjustments based on foot width. The design is praised for its stability, reducing torsion, and being forgiving for heel and midfoot strikers. The speaker also touches on the potential need for low-profile orthotics to enhance performance and extend the shoe’s life. For lighter runners, the shoes improve in performance, while heavier runners might need more reinforcement. Overall, the Rebel V4 is highlighted as an excellent shoe for midfoot strikers.
00:09:00
In this segment, the speaker discusses the attributes of a particular shoe, highlighting its forgiving nature and excellent transition through various gait cycles, especially for heel strikers and midfoot or rearfoot strikers. They critique the shoe’s lack of a shank, which results in a more pronounced heel snap for forefoot strikers. This shoe is recommended for lightweight, efficient runners with a consistent stride, particularly those who strike midfoot or rearfoot. However, it may not be ideal for beginners transitioning to forefoot striking. The speaker emphasizes that the shoe’s performance varies based on runner profiles and suggests potential buyers consider their specific running style and needs. Additionally, personal comfort and the shoe’s long-term training viability are highlighted as key factors in making a purchase decision.
00:12:00
In this part of the video, the speaker compares the Shanks shoes to Nike Vomero 17. They encourage viewers to click on the video linked above, subscribe to the channel, and respect the information provided.