This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:12:13
The video features Zach's comprehensive review of the New Balance Rebel V4 running shoes, focusing on design, performance, and user suitability. Key points include the shoes' lightweight structure, unique TPU weaving, and breathable yet less durable upper. The absence of a shank in the midsole, made from soft PEB foam, provides an enhanced bounce but affects heel stability. Zach discusses the forefoot's responsive feel and the foam's high abrasion resistance despite its thin outsole rubber. The shoes are suited for light, fast runners with strong legs, offering benefits mainly to medium to wide feet and requiring potential size adjustments for narrow feet.
Heavier runners might not experience optimal snapback, and low-profile orthotics are recommended for improved comfort and longevity. The wide base and supportive geometry make the shoes forgiving for heel and midfoot strikers, while advanced runners with efficient gaits maximize their performance benefits. Comparisons are drawn with other models like the ASICS Superblast and Nike Vomero 17, highlighting specific speed ratios and feel differences. Overall, while these shoes excel for certain running styles and body types, their suitability varies, emphasizing the importance of matching the shoe to the runner's unique needs and preferences.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, Zach introduces the New Balance Rebel V4 running shoes, highlighting their appearance as robust but noting some caveats that might influence user preference. He appreciates the intricate TPU weaving of the upper but notes potential issues with durability and lace compatibility. The tongue is minimal yet breathable, complementing the overall design aimed at expelling heat and moisture efficiently. However, this breathability compromises durability, as demonstrated by an upper durability test. Zach mentions initial heel slippage that improves with break-in and notes the absence of a shank in the midsole, which consists of soft PEB foam with a distinctive scoop shape for enhanced bounce.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the design elements and performance characteristics of a specific running shoe. The main points include:
1. The rear foot lacks a solid structure, comprising mainly foam, which impacts its bounce.
2. The forefoot, with less stack, interacts better with the ground, providing more pop and a responsive feel.
3. The foam is described as extremely soft and comfortable, though not the most performance-oriented compared to other peba-based shoes.
4. The midsole features significant exposed foam with a unique pattern for different strike positions, and the outsole has landing pads for rear-foot strikers.
5. Durability tests on the outsole show higher than expected resistance to abrasion despite the thin rubber.
6. The shoe is praised for its lightweight design and suitable for runners with strong, lean legs and a fast strike pattern.
7. A comparison is made to the A6 super blast, noting a similar speed ratio.
8. The shoe is noted for high peba foam in the back and is recommended for light runners, who can effectively benefit from its compression and responsive push-back.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses the performance and fit of the Rebel V4 running shoes. He mentions that heavier runners may not experience as much snapback, but the shoes remain lightweight and quick for those with the right stride and cadence. The grip test showed typical performance for its class on various surfaces. He describes the fit as generous, suitable for medium to wide feet, with narrow-footed individuals potentially needing a smaller size. The shoe is forgiving and stable for both heel and midfoot strikers due to its wide base and supportive geometry. The reviewer suggests considering low-profile orthotics to prolong the shoe’s life and enhance comfort. He also notes that lighter runners benefit more from these shoes, whereas heavier runners might need additional reinforcement.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the performance and suitability of a running shoe for different types of runners. The main points include: the shoe’s forgiving nature due to its midsole geometry and radius, making it ideal for heel and midfoot strikers but less so for forefoot strikers without a shank. The speaker notes that the shoe transitions smoothly through a full gait cycle, appearing as a “work of art.” It’s suggested that advanced runners with efficient gaits may benefit more from these shoes. The suitability of the shoe also varies based on the runner’s build and strike pattern—lighter runners may find them more favorable compared to heavier runners. The speaker highlights the shoe’s comfortable strike and weight distribution, particularly appreciating its performance on a treadmill. Lastly, they invite viewers to share their thoughts and experiences with the shoe in the comments.
00:12:00
In this part of the video, the speaker mentions differences in feel between Shanks and Nike Vomero 17. The speaker also encourages viewers to click on the video link above and to subscribe to the channel.