This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:11:29
The video compares two models of On's daily trainers – the oncloud Monster hyper and the oncloud Monster 2. The hyper is lighter, more expensive at $220, and features a new midsole setup, while the monster 2 is priced at $180. Both offer roomy toe boxes but the Hyper provides a tighter fit. Opinions vary on the ride comfort with the Hyper being seen as slightly better, although both are categorized as easy daily trainers. Overall, the Hyper is more versatile but the Monster 2 is considered a better value, especially for those on a budget. Alternative shoe options are also suggested, such as Brooks Glycerin or Saucony Endorphin Speed 4.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, the focus is on comparing two of On’s big cushion daily trainers – the oncloud Monster hyper and the oncloud monster 2. The oncloud Monster hyper is lighter, has a bigger stack, and a new midsole setup aimed at boosting comfort and energy. The hyper is priced at $220 while the monster 2 is cheaper at $180. Details about the stack heights, weights, midsole materials, and outsole designs of both shoes are provided. The fit of both shoes is discussed, highlighting that they typically run true to size and offer roomy toe boxes.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker compares the fit of the On Cloud Monster 2 and the On Cloud Monster Hyper. Both shoes have roomy toe boxes but the Hyper model offers a slightly tighter and more secure fit overall. The speaker recommends going true to size for both shoes. They find both shoes to be categorized as easy daily trainers, suitable for easy efforts and long runs like marathon training, but note they feel clunky and firm. The Cloudtech pods on the shoes are dominant, and the ride is not particularly enjoyable for a heel striker. The speaker finds the shoes comfortable and protective for logging miles but suggests there are better options available from other brands.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer compares the On Cloud Monster 2 to the On Cloud Monster Hyper. The Cloud Monster 2 is deemed clunkier and less enjoyable compared to the original Cloud Monster, providing protection and a firm but comfortable ride. The Cloud Monster Hyper, despite its higher price, did not significantly enhance the running experience for the reviewer. The Hyper features a more responsive midsole with a pebax wedge, offering cushioning without collapsing and a quicker response during midfoot landings. The Hyper is described as a cruising shoe with more energy, while the Cloud Monster 2 is noted as a solid easy day shoe lacking some versatility. Both shoes are deemed to have good step-in comfort with minor differences in ride feel.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, the presenter compares the On Cloud Monster Hyper and the On Cloud Monster 2 shoes, both suitable for easy and long runs. The Cloud Monster Hyper has a higher price tag but offers a slightly better ride, while the Cloud Monster 2 presents better value. The decision between the two largely depends on personal preferences, with the former being softer and the latter having a bit more punch. The Cloud Monster Hyper is praised for being more versatile, but the Cloud Monster 2 is recommended for better value. Considerations also include alternatives from other brands like the Brooks Glycerin, Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, or the Puma Velocity Nitro for a more enjoyable ride at a lower cost. The summary emphasizes that the Cloud Monster 2 is the better choice in terms of value, especially for those on a budget.