This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:28:31
The video discusses the concerns surrounding Agenda 21, a UN sustainable development plan impacting private property rights. It covers regionalization efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area, highlighting unelected boards controlling land use. The speakers delve into the deceptive techniques used in governance decisions and the importance of individual freedom, advocating for legal action against restrictive plans like One Bay Area. The potential violations of constitutional rights are discussed, emphasizing the need to resist central planning that dictates lifestyle choices. Joining the fight for liberty and protecting property rights is encouraged.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, the host Chris Pareja interviews Rosa Quarry, a property rights activist, and anti-Agenda 21 advocate from the Post-Sustainability Institute. Rosa discusses her background and how she became involved in activism after discovering fraudulent projects during her service on a citizens oversight committee for a redevelopment project. She explains the concept of Agenda 21, a United Nations sustainable development plan signed in 1992, aimed at inventorying and controlling various aspects of the world, sparking concerns over private property rights.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses a regionalization plan being implemented in the San Francisco Bay Area, backed by a biodiversity study. The plan involves regional boards like MTC and ABAG controlling land use and directing changes in lifestyle for nine million people in the area. The concept of regional governance, led by unelected boards, is highlighted as contrasting with traditional elected levels of government. Similar regionalization efforts are noted in Southern California and across the US. The ultimate goal is seen as mirroring the EU model, focusing on high-density housing and public transit over single-family homes. The speaker emphasizes the widespread nature of this regional governance approach both in the US and globally.
00:06:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses how a plan similar to Agenda 21, with origins from the RAND Corporation in the 1950s and 60s, aims to shape public opinion towards predetermined outcomes. They highlight the push towards concepts like reducing private vehicles, single-family homes, and meat-eating, which are deemed unsustainable. The speaker has written a book called “Behind the Green Mask UN Agenda 21” to shed light on the local implementation of Agenda 21 globally. They note the challenge in discussing Agenda 21 with those ideologically attached to sustainable development principles, like in educational systems and urban planning. The speaker engages with various groups, including Tea Parties, Republican groups, and universities, to share this information and provoke critical thinking about these issues.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the global reach of Agenda 21 and the lack of awareness among individuals outside the United States. The conversation highlights the resistance and shock among some elected officials who are unfamiliar with the origins and details of the plan, despite being involved in public input sessions. The speaker mentions the Delphi technique used to shape public opinion and the influence of organizations like the American Planning Association in promoting the agenda. The video also touches on the speaker’s firsthand experience at a national conference, emphasizing the indoctrination aspect of the plan and the importance of awareness and resistance.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the importance of individual freedom, specifically the right to own and use private property. They express concern about losing freedom due to certain elected officials being influenced and the lack of public input being considered in decision-making processes. The focus is on the One Bay Area plan, which is criticized for heavily restricting development to specific urban areas, limiting property use for residents. The speaker mentions plans to sue to stop the One Bay Area plan, emphasizing the need for legal action to prevent the implementation of what they believe to be a detrimental plan. The importance of fundraising and mobilizing support for the lawsuit is highlighted.
00:15:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the deceptive tactics used in governance decisions, including the Delphi technique and stakeholder manipulation. They highlight how non-elected organizations are empowered under Agenda 21, violating federal and state constitutions. Specific violations mentioned include the Fifth Amendment (taking property without compensation) and the Fourteenth Amendment (unequal protection under the law). Furthermore, the speaker emphasizes objections to the plan based on the California Constitution, which grants the enjoyment and use of property and stresses the importance of exhausting administrative remedies before legal action.
00:18:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses a 28-year plan that is re-evaluated every four years, likening it to a “living document.” The discussion touches on Agenda 21 and Common Core, highlighting concerns about standardization and lack of logic in these initiatives. There is a distinction made between being a liberal democrat and a progressive, with emphasis on individual preferences in mass transit, housing, and green spaces. Criticisms are raised about using tax dollars to subsidize specific property types without demand, mentioning organizations like MTC and ABAC being linked to Agenda 21. The speaker questions the rationale behind certain transportation investments and density decisions in the Bay Area, hinting at a disconnect from reality and lack of demand justification for subsidies.
00:21:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the monitoring and surveillance of populations using transit systems as part of a larger plan. They mention ways to learn more about supporting a lawsuit and gaining information about their book “Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21,” available on Amazon and specific websites. The conversation shifts to talk about constitutional law and the need for a second American revolution against a ruling class that does not listen to or defend the American people. The importance of upholding the constitution and the example of the electoral college are highlighted.
00:24:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses upcoming speakers at the Conservative Forum, mentioning names like Bill Whittle and Steve Forbes. The speaker also brings up logic questions related to the One Bay Area plan, specifically questioning the affordability of high-density housing and the impact of certain job scenarios. These questions aim to challenge the logic behind certain urban planning decisions.
00:27:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the impact of the One Bay Area plan on family time and quality of life. They express concerns about central planning organizations like One Bay Area dictating lifestyle choices. The speaker encourages viewers to educate themselves on the One Bay Area plan and join in the fight for liberty and protecting the Bay Area. The host signs off, mentioning joining him and other activists in this cause.