The summary of ‘Crowder’s Inflated Rumble Numbers CRASH Audience EVAPORATES’

00:00:00

In this segment, the hosts discuss recent events involving Stephen Crowder. They mention his conflict over a financial deal with The Daily Wire, in which a significant payout was disputed. Additionally, they talk about Crowder’s personal issues, particularly his ex-wife’s claims of his abusive behavior, both mentally and emotionally, throughout their marriage, including a period when she was expecting twins. This behavior was partly publicized through a video released by her. The segment also touches on Crowder’s avoidance of a debate with Ethan Klein, which he feared would include a surprise confrontation with one of the hosts as well as Crowder’s history of debates with other public figures.

00:03:00

In this part of the video, the discussion revolves around a man whose life and business deteriorated after he made questionable decisions, including timing his surgery to clash with his wife’s pregnancy for attention. Now divorced and in need of money, he attempts to rebrand himself using the hosts’ platform, much to their bewilderment. They express frustration over his lack of direct engagement and critical view on Stephen Crowder, condemning him as misogynistic, sexist, and homophobic. They also note Crowder’s apparent vanity and speculate on his downward personal spiral, remarking on his disheveled appearance and poorly chosen visuals in his content.

00:06:00

In this part of the video, the discussion revolves around a controversial figure who has been accused of workplace misconduct. Multiple articles in media outlets, including Mediaite and the New York Post, report that this individual allegedly sent inappropriate photos to male staffers. The conversation highlights the irony of these actions given the individual’s publicly known homophobia. The speakers also reflect on how their own committees considered but ultimately rejected similar inappropriate strategies. They speculate on whether the figure in question will address these allegations in upcoming statements. The segment wraps up by emphasizing the need for love and truth in any genuine change.

00:09:00

In this part of the video, the speaker addresses the concept of a “double entendre,” using it as a metaphor related to a journalistic show and as a critique of their ex-wife. They delve into personal anecdotes about divorce and contrast their experience with not engaging in specific actions attributed to others. The discussion shifts to Stephen, the subject of media attacks, emphasizing his ideological influence and the fear he instills in opponents. They mention personalities like Alex Jones and Carrie Lake, criticizing the contradiction between professing a love for truth while associating with known liars. Alex Jones is highlighted for the unprecedented fines he faced for public falsehoods. The segment concludes with commentary on building an ideological coalition and noting familiar faces like Nick Depaolo.

00:12:00

In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the career of Nick Depaolo, recounting a personal story from a 1997-1998 pilot called “Beat Cops.” The speaker reflects on Nick’s comments about the challenges of getting work in L.A. as a white man, which the speaker finds surprising given the prevalence of roles for white men, especially in the past. They highlight the irony of Depaolo being considered a “fresh new voice” by Steven Crowder, mentioning the numerous opportunities historically available to white men in television. The segment ends by hinting at new and exciting developments related to Crowder’s announcement, emphasizing that there’s a significant subtext people might be overlooking.

00:15:00

In this part of the video, the discussion revolves around the challenging conditions and low pay faced by police officers, particularly in certain states like Mississippi, Arkansas, and others where they earn less than $50,000 a year. The conversation also touches on the recent incident involving protesters in New York who were demonstrating against the chokehold death of Jordan Neely. There’s a mention of the consequences police face in today’s climate if they respond forcefully to such protesters. Additionally, there’s a brief mention of upcoming shows and networks, including a project involving Brian Callen and other personalities. The segment highlights the frustrations and complexities faced by law enforcement and hints at wider societal issues.

00:18:00

In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the viewership trends of Steven Crowder on Rumble, noting a significant disparity and fascinating fluctuations in views. They reflect on their own channel’s viewership patterns, highlighting a high point before COVID-19 and a subsequent drop when Bernie Sanders dropped out of the presidential race, followed by a recovery. They express concern about experiencing a drastic viewership drop, similar to Crowder’s drop from 2.5 million views in March to around 750,000 views in July. They attribute some of Crowder’s viewership spikes to personal drama, like his issues with his wife and controversies involving inappropriate pictures. The speaker emphasizes the panic and potential consequences if their own channel faced such a decline.

00:21:00

In this segment of the video, the discussion centers around Steven Crowder’s declining influence and the potential factors behind it. They speculate that a boost from the platform Rumble might have artificially inflated his popularity initially. It is suggested that many personalities on Rumble are paid to be there, which might skew perception. They question the integrity of ad sales and view counts on platforms like Rumble, as they may not rely heavily on actual advertiser engagement compared to YouTube. The conversation touches on the difficulty of changing audience behavior and notes the significant and rapid drop in Crowder’s viewership, suggesting it could be due to external manipulation rather than organic changes. Additionally, they remark on other public figures like Dave Rubin, who is perceived to be less impactful, citing his recent activity of reposting content from others.

00:24:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker mentions being on vacation but anticipates the video involving Jimmy Dore criticizing Anderson Cooper to be interesting. The discussion shifts to figures like Ruben, Crowder, and Candace Owens, describing the tensions and conflicts among them. The speaker alludes to a significant upcoming event, referring to a “big relaunch,” and expresses amusement at money being spent on certain initiatives, hinting at wastefulness. Lastly, there’s a critique of the use of the Mission Impossible font by right-wingers, implying it doesn’t enhance their tough image.