This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:11:00
The video centers on discussing affordable clones of high-end Louis Vuitton fragrances, presented by Joseon from Kingdom Sense. He introduces Flavia's Limpression, a clone of Louis Vuitton's L’Immensité, detailing its minimalistic design and fresh, citrusy scent. The reviewer also explores Louis Vuitton's Lemon City, praising its classic, manly fragrance profile with notes of citrus, greenery, and woods, suitable for spring and summer. Mason Alhambra's Jean Lowe Immortal, a similar clone, is compared side-by-side to Lemon City, highlighting differences in atomizer quality and packaging features like a magnetic cap. Both Limpression and Jean Lowe Immortal offer impressive longevity and affordability, making them strong alternatives to the original Louis Vuitton fragrances, which are significantly pricier. The reviewer shares their personal preference for Gene Low Immortal due to its scent profile and longevity but acknowledges L'impression Parfum's closer resemblance to the original Louis Vuitton fragrances. The video concludes with a call for viewer engagement and recognition of the popularity of Louis Vuitton dupes.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, Joseon from Kingdom Sense introduces a fragrance from the house of Flavia, a sub-brand of Armaf known for the Club de Nuit line. He explains that Flavia has a new line inspired by Louis Vuitton fragrances, which are typically very expensive. The focus of this segment is on the Flavia fragrance called Limpression, which is a clone of Louis Vuitton’s L’Immensité. Joseon shows the packaging, describing it as similar to Louis Vuitton’s with a sticker of authenticity. He presents the 100ml bottle, noting its minimal design and detailing. He describes Limpression as a fresh, green, citrusy fragrance and demonstrates the atomizer, concluding that it’s satisfactory.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses a fragrance called Louis Vuitton Lemon City. They describe it as a classic, manly fragrance with notes of greenery, citruses, and woods, and they express their love for it, noting its suitability as a signature scent. The fragrance has top notes of citrus, possibly rosemary or mint, and ginger, making it vibrant and uplifting. It is recommended primarily for spring and summertime due to its bright and energetic nature.
The reviewer then compares it to Mason Alhambra’s version, Jean Lowe Immortal. They note similarities in color and packaging, including the cool feature of a magnetic cap on the Jean Lowe bottle. They proceed to spray both fragrances side by side to compare them, pointing out that while the Jean Lowe bottle has a magnetic cap, its atomizer is inferior to the LV Lemon City’s atomizer.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the speaker compares two fragrance clones to a Louis Vuitton fragrance. They note that while both clones are extremely close to the original and cost under $50, the Louis Vuitton fragrance costs between $300 to $400. The clones offer impressive longevity for fresher scents, lasting about five to seven hours depending on the amount applied. The limpression parfum is slightly longer-lasting and has a more balanced scent profile that closely resembles Louis Vuitton’s fragrance. The gene low version has a more citrus and green scent. Overall, both clones are highly recommended as affordable alternatives.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses two fragrances: Joma Shop’s Gene Low Immortal and Flavia’s L’impression Parfum. They find Gene Low Immortal to be the better fragrance due to its longevity, magnetic cap, and personal preference for the scent. It leans more towards green and citrusy notes. L’impression Parfum, however, is noted for its closer resemblance to Louis Vuitton’s classic masculine scent, with a balanced profile that includes woody notes. The speaker concludes by encouraging viewers to like, subscribe, and comment with their favorite Louis Vuitton fragrance, acknowledging the popularity of Louis Vuitton dupes in the market.