This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 01:26:02
The video spans a comprehensive evaluation of various screen protectors for the Galaxy S23 Plus, focusing on installation processes, performance assessments, and durability tests. Key brands reviewed include amFilm, Spigen, ZAGG, Rinky, Super Shields, Whiskin, Walmart, Mauwi, casemate, and Whitestone Dome.
The installation highlights feature using cleaning kits, alignment tools, and methods to ensure bubble-free applications. Performance tests examine scratch resistance using multiple hardness levels, drop tests from various heights, and fingerprint sensor functionality. Generally, tempered glass protectors, like those from Spigen, Rinky, and Mauwi, show reliable scratch resistance and durability, with some exceptions for specific products that fail drop tests early or scratch easily.
Special mentions include the ZAGG Fusion XTR Eco film for its touch and fingerprint sensor compatibility despite a grippy texture, and the Whitestone Dome UV gen film for its precise alignment and smooth finish. The video concludes with the presenter's recommendations for the best options in terms of installation ease, durable protection, and overall functionality, providing links for purchase and inviting continued viewer support.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, the reviewer celebrates five years of creating best and worst screen protectors videos and expresses gratitude to supporters. The focus is on testing screen protectors for the Galaxy S23 Plus. The reviewer outlines the testing process, including viewer recommendations, providing links, timestamps, and personal recommendations at the end.
They demonstrate the installation of the amFilm tempered glass screen protector, emphasizing proper cleaning, easy installation, and case compatibility. The reviewer tests the screen protector’s scratch resistance, finding it withstands up to level six, deeper at level seven. They also conduct a drop test, with the screen protector remaining intact up to eight and three-quarters feet, showing excellent protection.
The reviewer moves on to the Spigen Glass TR Easy Fit screen protector, outlining the included items and highlighting easy installation instructions.
00:10:00
In this part of the video, the presenter demonstrates how to install a screen protector and test its performance. Steps include sliding a finger down the middle, using a squeegee to remove bubbles, and ensuring a perfect fit with minimal fingerprint pickup. They then conduct drop tests from heights ranging from two to eight feet, with the screen protector proving durable up to eight feet. Scratch tests are conducted using levels five to seven, showing no scratches at level five, minor at level six, and deeper at level seven, indicating good scratch resistance. Finally, the presenter installs a rear camera protector, checking its clarity and scratch resistance, confirming no issues with camera performance.
00:20:00
In this part of the video, the presenter discusses the installation and functionality of the ZAGG Fusion XTR Eco film screen protector. They outline the installation process, including using a guide, dust sticker, and squeegee to ensure a bubble-free application. The screen protector has a grippy texture, which the presenter doesn’t prefer, but it works well with the touch and fingerprint sensor. It picks up fingerprints but they are easily wiped away. The fit with cases is also tested and found to be generally compatible. Later, they assess the scratch resistance, noting that the protector handles minor scratches but is vulnerable to more substantial ones like those from keys.
Next, they review the Rinky privacy tempered glass screen protector, detailing a similarly straightforward installation process. This protector excels in fingerprint resistance and case compatibility. They also test its privacy features by observing the screen clarity at different angles. The video concludes with a drop test from various heights, showing the tempered glass maintaining integrity until a six-foot drop, which impresses the presenter.
00:30:00
In this segment of the video, the presenter reviews three different screen protectors, assessing their durability, installation ease, and usability with fingerprint sensors and drop protection. The first privacy screen protector performs well, withstanding up to six feet drops and exhibiting comparable scratch resistance to other tempered glass protectors. The second, Super Shields tempered glass protector, although easy to install, cracks at four feet and has moderate scratch resistance. The presenter notes it’s not the best choice for drop protection. The final product, a Whiskin screen protector, claims to have a 9H hardness but fails scratch tests quickly, revealing it is likely a film protector with dubious durability. Fingerprint sensor performance varies slightly across the reviews, with some readings impacted by dry skin.
00:40:00
In this segment, the video reviews multiple screen protectors. The initial one is a thick film protector that is not recommended due to alignment issues and its lack of glass components. The presenter demonstrates the installation process, noting potential issues with case compatibility, but concludes that it installs easily and works well with the fingerprint sensor despite scratching easily.
Next, a tempered glass screen protector from Walmart is assessed. The installation guide is misaligned, hindering proper adherence and camera cutout placement. The fingerprint sensor performs poorly, and while the touch sensitivity is good, it fails the drop test from four feet and scratches at a level six. This protector is not recommended.
Lastly, a tempered glass protector from Mauwi is tested. The installation process is straightforward, and it offers a good fit with camera cutout alignment and case compatibility. The touch sensitivity remains as good as the phone’s original glass, making this screen protector the preferred choice.
00:50:00
In this part of the video, the presenter first tests the fingerprint functionality with a screen protector installed and provides a tip to re-register fingerprints if they don’t work. Then, the device is put into a Spigen rugged armor case, confirming a good fit and minimal fingerprint accumulation on the protector. A drop test from two and three feet shows the screen protector failing at three feet, indicating poor drop protection.
The scratch test reveals no scratches at level five, light scratches at level six, and deeper scratches at level seven, which aligns with the performance of other protectors. The presenter advises skipping this screen protector due to its subpar drop protection.
Next, camera lens protectors are installed and tested, showing good performance and minimal bulk addition. A similar scratch test is conducted on these protectors with comparable results. Another screen protector is installed, featuring a mirror-like effect, and performs well with fingerprints and touch sensitivity but fails the drop test again, leading to a thumbs down.
Lastly, the installation process for a different screen protector by casemate is demonstrated, but issues such as misalignment and creasing occur, showing the limitations of the installation guide used.
01:00:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses the installation and performance of two different screen protectors. The first screen protector is a film type, which proves to be misaligned after application and shows susceptibility to scratches, but it is self-healing to some extent. The second screen protector is the Whitestone Dome UV gen film, which comes with a comprehensive installation kit including two packets, a UV LED light, and a squeegee. The UV gen film aligns well, is smooth to touch, and performs well with fingerprint sensors although it picks up some fingerprints. After curing with the UV light, the screen protector fits snugly with no lifting when placed in a case. The reviewer gives a positive assessment of this UV gen film despite minor issues, and then introduces the White Stone Dome glass EZ with its own installation guide and tempered glass protectors.
01:10:00
In this part of the video, the presenter demonstrates how to install a tempered glass screen protector on a phone. They guide the viewer through aligning the protector, ensuring it fits within the case, and assessing its fingerprint resistance and clarity. The protector is tested for scratch resistance using different levels of hardness, showing it holds up well. The presenter then moves on to using a premium screen protector with liquid adhesive, detailing each step including preparing the phone, applying adhesive, and curing it using a UV LED. The process includes ensuring all ports are covered, aligning the protector correctly, and cleaning up any excess adhesive. The segment concludes with a final curing step for enhanced protection.
01:20:00
In this part of the video, the presenter reviews the installation and performance of a screen protector. The installation went smoothly, and the screen protector aligned perfectly with the phone, featuring cutouts for the camera and a slight gap around the phone. The touch sensitivity remained similar to the original glass, and the fingerprint sensor worked well. The screen protector allowed for easy cleaning of fingerprints and fit well within a phone case. The clarity was excellent, and the scratch test showed performance on par with other tempered glass protectors. Instructions for removing the protector without residue were provided. The presenter concludes by recommending several screen protectors for different categories, emphasizing their protection and compatibility features. He provides links in the description for purchasing and encourages viewers to support the channel.