This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:08:05
The reviewer, 60 Grit, provides a critical assessment of the ghost case by dbrand, particularly for the Pixel 8 Pro. Throughout the video, the reviewer expresses skepticism about the overwhelmingly positive reviews from influencers, suggesting these endorsements are unreliable due to sponsorships. He consistently criticizes the case's poor quality, noting issues such as tight fit, cheap feel, discoloration, and minimal protection for the phone's camera and screen. Describing the case as overpriced and inferior, the reviewer likens it to low-cost alternatives found on Amazon and goes as far as comparing it to a bubble gum machine toy due to its poor quality and appearance. He strongly discourages purchasing this product and recommends looking into more reliable alternatives, like those from Peak Design, Google, or Belroy. The overall conclusion is a firm disapproval of the ghost case, emphasizing it is not worth the money and highlighting the dubious nature of paid promotions.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer, 60 Grit, discusses the ghost case by dbrand. He expresses skepticism about the positive reviews from other influencers, since they are often sponsored. He notes the sleek packaging but quickly transitions to criticism upon unboxing the case for the Pixel 8 Pro. The reviewer is disappointed by the case’s tight fit, cheap feel, and noticeable discoloration, likening it to a low-cost Amazon product. He strongly disapproves of the case’s quality, stating it’s not worth the price, and criticizes the promotional practices of influencers who are paid to endorse the product. Despite potential offers to promote it, he firmly states he would decline due to its poor quality.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses their negative experience with a case from Dbrand. They mention that despite the case fitting well and being snug, it suffers from significant quality issues, including discoloration and slippery sides. The reviewer criticizes the minimal protection offered for the camera and front screen due to the lack of sufficient lip around the edges. They express strong disappointment, stating they would never recommend or buy this case again and suggest considering alternatives like cases from Peak Design, Google, Belroy, or even the iPhone. The reviewer also comments on the poor value for money and briefly jokes about the expected backlash for their opinions.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the speaker expresses strong dissatisfaction with a phone case that they believe is extremely overpriced for its quality. They describe the case as feeling cheap and flimsy, comparing it to something one might find in a bubble gum machine. The case is criticized for being a “fingerprint magnet” and having a “horrible” rainbow-like appearance. The speaker is adamant about not supporting the company behind this product, noting they wouldn’t endorse it even for a significant sum of money. They encourage viewers to leave comments and reviews and to consider other, better options for phone cases.