This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:09:53
In this video, the presenter conducts an in-depth comparison of two gaming monitors by Asus—a 240Hz OLED model and a 360Hz IPS model. Key themes include the analysis of image quality, gaming performance, and technical specifications of both screens. The OLED monitor is praised for its superior mid-range contrast, color accuracy, and immersive image quality, boasting virtually instant pixel response times (0.1 milliseconds) that contribute to minimal ghosting. In contrast, the IPS monitor, despite its higher refresh rate and excellent performance, exhibits more ghosting due to longer response times (1.5 milliseconds).
Through various tests, such as the moving UFO test, the presenter demonstrates that the OLED monitor's rapid response time and zero percent overshoot result in cleaner frames and less visible ghosting compared to the IPS model, though both panels display similar motion blur when tracking images with correct shutter speed.
The presenter discusses the importance of high refresh rates and backlight strobing techniques in reducing motion blur and highlights the potential future of OLED monitors with higher refresh rates like 360Hz and 480Hz. Durability concerns regarding OLED burn-in are addressed, with recommendations for regular pixel cleaning and mixed usage to prolong monitor life. However, the sub-pixel layout of OLED could cause slight text blurring, making it less ideal for extensive reading or typing.
Overall, the OLED monitor is preferred for its superior image quality and reduced ghosting, despite its slightly higher cost and limitations in backlight strobing. Future advancements in OLED technology are eagerly anticipated to further enhance gaming experiences.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, the presenter compares two 27-inch gaming monitors by Asus—one featuring OLED technology and the other IPS. The OLED model operates at 240Hz, while the IPS version runs at 360Hz. The presenter has extensively tested both monitors and shares detailed comparisons regarding image quality, brightness, and overall gaming experience. Key observations include the OLED’s superior mid-range contrast and more immersive image quality, whereas IPS still delivers outstanding performance but appears less vivid when compared directly to the OLED. The Asus OLED monitor is noted for its better brightness and color accuracy out of the box, making it a superior option despite being slightly more expensive. The presenter emphasizes the significant difference in gaming experience between OLED and IPS technologies, highlighting the enhanced visibility and realism provided by the OLED panel.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the response times and overall feel of playing competitive games, specifically OverWatch 2, on different monitors: a 360Hz IPS and a 240Hz OLED. They explain that OLED monitors have virtually instant pixel response times (0.1 milliseconds), significantly lower than IPS monitors (1.5 milliseconds). This fast response time in OLEDs results in minimal to no ghosting, making every new frame clean and free of pixel transitions from previous frames. However, they clarify that zero ghosting does not mean zero motion blur, as motion blur is influenced by how eyes track and interpret images, not just pixel response times. The speaker uses graphs to compare the pixel response times and reveals that although the 360Hz IPS monitor has excellent response times, it still exhibits more ghosting compared to the 240Hz OLED. They conclude by highlighting the difference between ghosting and motion blur, emphasizing the role of human vision in perceiving blur on screens.
00:06:00
In this segment, the focus is on comparing high-refresh-rate monitors, specifically a 360Hz IPS panel and a 240Hz OLED panel. The main points include:
1. **High Refresh Rates & Backlight Strobing**: High refresh rates or backlight strobing techniques like ULMB are essential to reduce motion blur caused by the sample and hold effect.
2. **Performance Comparison**:
– On a moving UFO test, the 240Hz OLED shows almost no ghosting compared to the 360Hz IPS, which has noticeable ghosting.
– When tracking the image with correct shutter speed, both panels display similar motion blur.
3. **OLED Advantages**:
– The 240Hz OLED has 0.1 millisecond response times and zero percent overshoot, resulting in superior image quality.
– The OLED lacks brightness to support backlight strobing, which could further improve smoothness.
4. **Preference and Use Cases**:
– The OLED is preferred for its overall better image quality and lower ghosting, despite the inability to provide backlight strobing.
– The 360Hz IPS is preferred for extreme smoothness and is ideal for very bright environments or competitive gaming.
5. **Future Prospects**: The segment concludes with excitement for future OLED gaming monitors reaching even higher refresh rates like 360Hz and 480Hz, improving the gaming experience significantly.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the speaker addresses the durability and usability of OLED monitors. They mention no signs of burn-in even after extensive use and anticipate that it would take around a year and a half of intense use to see any. Regular pixel cleaning and mixed usage are recommended to maintain the monitor’s condition. However, the speaker notes the potential issue with the OLED’s sub-pixel layout, which can make reading text slightly blurry, making it less suitable as a primary monitor for extensive reading and typing. They offer recommendations for more affordable alternatives and conclude by expressing their hope that viewers enjoyed the video, with a promise to share updates in the future.