This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:21:18
The video explores the creator's journey testing various AR and VR glasses for travel and work purposes, comparing features, comfort, and performance. They discuss the distinctions between AR and VR technology, highlighting limitations and advantages of different models. The X-re glasses emerge as a top choice due to their screen quality, display size, and functionality, enabling virtual monitors. The presenter acknowledges the potential of the technology but advises caution due to high prices and ongoing development. Key terms include AR glasses, VR glasses, diopters, electrochromic display, field of view (FOV), and 3 degrees of freedom. Notable models discussed are Vur, Rids, Xre, Vit, Roids, and Xra. The importance of testing glasses before purchase and the need for further development in the field are emphasized.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, the creator discusses their exploration of AR glasses due to travel and work needs. They purchased three different AR glasses to compare and find the best fit for their requirements. The video is not sponsored, and the creator paid for the glasses. The difference between AR and VR glasses is explained, highlighting that AR overlays digital images on the physical world while VR immerses the user in a virtual environment. The limited processing power of AR glasses is mentioned, along with the fact that they project images from external devices onto the real world. This summary gives viewers an overview of the creator’s motivation for testing AR glasses and the basic distinctions between AR and VR technology.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the limitations of movie theater style screens in comparison to VR goggles due to gaps letting in light and lack of full immersion. They talk about what comes in the box with different glasses models, such as a plastic blackout cover for RIT glasses and optional purchase for V Fe. The X-re glasses provide complete darkness and lens inserts for corrective vision are available. Regarding design and comfort, X-re glasses are deemed most comfortable, followed by Roids, while V glasses rank third. Features like diopters for nearsightedness are discussed, with Vit and Roids having adjustable diopters for vision correction.
00:06:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discussed their experience using a VR headset with adjustable lenses up to minus 6. They found that at minus 6, the screen pushed back and created a black border, affecting the immersive experience and causing eye fatigue. They recommend using optional prescription lenses to avoid these issues. The speaker also compared electrochromic display features of different VR headsets, noting that the Xre had better dimming settings compared to the Vitur, providing a more enjoyable viewing experience even in the presence of external light.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the usability of different smart glasses models. They mention the electrochromic dimming feature and the ability to cycle between 0, 35, and 100 percent for visual awareness. The speaker compares the screen quality of the glasses, noting that the x-re model has the most accurate color production and best overall display quality. They also discuss the field of view (FOV) differences, with the roids having the largest display but less noticeable impact compared to the x-rs, which offer a more immersive experience. The speaker concludes by ranking the xra as the top choice for screen quality, followed by the roids.
00:12:00
In this segment of the video, the presenter compares three different devices for AR glasses: Vur, Rids, and Xre. The Vur has the smallest screen size and worst image quality with a 60 HZ refresh rate, while the Rids and Xre have a 120 HZ refresh rate. The Rids lacks useful apps, the Vur has an iOS-only app that requires an extra adapter for head tracking, while the Xrs have a Nebula app for Android allowing AR space without an extra accessory. The Xrs also support Dex mode for a computer-like experience. However, they lack 3 degrees of freedom compared to full VR goggles, unless used with a separate device like a phone or hardware.
00:15:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the limited usefulness of the 3 degrees of freedom feature on VES without the neckband and limited app support. They mention the availability of X-rail within the Nebula app for compatible Android phones but note the restricted apps for the 3 degrees of freedom feature. The focus then shifts to the X-reels, highlighting their compatibility with Mac and potentially Windows, allowing for the creation of virtual screens or monitors. While the productivity potential of the X-reels is acknowledged, there are limitations due to the narrow field of view. The speaker also briefly mentions accessories available for different devices, like the neckband for Vitus and the roket station for Roets, both providing portable Android TV functionality. Additionally, the speaker introduces the beam accessory for XRA, designed initially for other purposes.
00:18:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the three different modes of the AR glasses, which include body anchor mode, side view mode, and smooth follow mode. The smooth follow mode is highlighted as the most useful, especially for minimizing motion sickness during movement. The speaker shares their thoughts on the AR glasses’ utility for watching movies and productivity, noting the X-Re pair as the clear winner due to its screen quality, display size, and virtual monitor functionality. They express concerns about the high price point of the glasses, emphasizing the need to try them out before purchasing.
00:21:00
In this part of the video, the speaker mentions that the technology being discussed has significant potential but emphasizes that it is not currently fully developed or effective.