This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:09:59
The video compares the On Cloudmonster 2 and On Cloudmonster Hyper running shoes, focusing on their features and performance. Both shoes are suitable for different types of runs, with the Cloudmonster 2 offering a firmer ride and the Hyper being softer and faster. The Hyper is favored for its cushioning and performance, despite being pricier. Fit issues were noted, with the Cloudmonster 2 being too big for many. The presenter recommends the Cloudmonster Hyper for those seeking enhanced features. Personal preferences as a runner influenced the speaker's preference for the Hyper, and viewers are directed to FleetFeet's reviews for more information. The need for improvements in sizing is emphasized for future models.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, Brandon from Fleet Feet compares the On Cloudmonster 2 and On Cloudmonster Hyper shoes. The On Cloudmonster 2 features an engineered mesh upper, a speedboard, dual-density Helion Super Foam, Cloudtec geometry, and traditional rubber coverage, best for easy or long run days. On the other hand, the On Cloudmonster Hyper has an engineered woven upper, Helion HF Hyper foam, Helion Superfoam, and PEBA Helion HF bounce board, suitable for long run days and uptempo miles. Both shoes have fit issues, with the On Cloudmonster 2 being too big for many, while the Hyper fits snugly. The team experienced mixed opinions regarding sizing across both shoes. The On Cloudmonster 2 offers a firmer and more responsive ride compared to the Hyper. Brandon highlights the need for On to address sizing issues for future improvements.
00:03:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker reviews the On Cloudmonster 2 and On Cloudmonster Hyper shoes. They highlight that the Cloudmonster 2 offers a firmer ride with decent cushioning, while the Cloudmonster Hyper is softer, more propulsive, and faster. Both shoes are suitable for tempo runs and long run days but differ in their feel and responsiveness. The Cloudmonster Hyper is recommended for a faster, snappier underfoot experience, while the Cloudmonster 2 is described as more basic but still fun. The shoes have similar geometries and fits, making them good training companions. The Cloudmonster 2 is suggested for easier and relaxed days, while the Cloudmonster Hyper is recommended for faster long runs or workout days. Key details include the specifications of both shoes, with a six millimeter drop for both models and different stack heights in the heel and toe. Overall, both shoes are praised for their performance and versatility.
00:06:00
In this segment of the video, the presenter compares the On Cloudmonster Hyper and On Cloudmonster 2 running shoes, highlighting differences in stack height, weight, and price. The On Cloudmonster Hyper has a higher stack height, is lighter, and retails for $40 more than the On Cloudmonster 2. The presenter favors the On Cloudmonster Hyper due to its cushioning, fit, and overall performance, while acknowledging that the On Cloudmonster 2 is a more budget-friendly option. Ultimately, the On Cloudmonster Hyper is recommended for those looking for enhanced features despite the higher price point.
00:09:00
In this segment of the video, the speaker compares the On Cloudmonster 2 and the On Cloudmonster Hyper running shoes, indicating a preference for the Cloudmonster Hyper due to personal preferences as a runner. They recommend checking out YouTube or the blog for detailed reviews by the FleetFeet review team. The speaker invites viewers to leave suggestions for shoes to review or compare. Finally, they encourage liking, subscribing to the channel, and following them on various social media platforms for additional resources.