The summary of ‘Best And Worst Screen Protectors For Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra’

This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.

00:00:0001:16:05

The video reviews various screen protectors for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, evaluating their installation processes, scratch resistance, fingerprint sensor compatibility, S Pen functionality, and case compatibility. Different types of screen protectors, including film, glass, and liquid adhesive options, are demonstrated and assessed in terms of adhesion, scratch protection, and ease of installation. Key points include the importance of proper alignment and adhesion for optimal performance, with some protectors receiving positive recommendations while others are advised against due to issues like poor adhesion and installation challenges. Notable brands and products mentioned include White Stone Dome, Spigen, Nilkin, and AmFilm. Overall, the video provides insights into selecting the right screen protector based on performance and user experience.

00:00:00

In this segment of the video, the host introduces various screen protectors for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They start with film and glass screen protectors that don’t use liquid adhesive, followed by those that do. The demonstration shows the installation process of a White Stone Dome Premium Film screen protector with camera lens protectors. The installation is detailed and includes testing the in-display fingerprint sensor and S Pen compatibility. The screen protector is evaluated for scratch resistance and self-healing capabilities. The process of peeling off the protector and the final assessment of the product’s features, such as being case-friendly, are highlighted. Additionally, Spigen’s NeoFlex Optical Film screen protector with a liquid application method is briefly introduced.

00:10:00

In this segment of the video, the reviewer demonstrates the installation and review of two different types of screen protectors.

The first screen protector uses a watery liquid for adhesion, which the reviewer did not prefer due to the potential for issues with edges, bumps, and ridges, resulting in a thumbs down and lack of scratch resistance improvement. The second screen protector, a matte tempered glass type, was installed with a guide and included adhesive only around the edges. Although the fingerprint sensor and compatibility with writing tools worked well, the reviewer noted a visible cutout at the bottom and some lifting issues with certain cases, leading to a neutral assessment.

Lastly, a film screen protector by Nilkin was reviewed, which utilized a guide and stickers for alignment. This type did not stay in place easily due to adhesive only at the edges and was given a thumbs down due to difficulties with adhesion and overall performance.

00:20:00

In this segment of the video, the individual starts by applying a screen protector with some difficulty and ends up with bubbles and imperfections after installation. They test the functionality of the fingerprint sensor and s pen, and conduct a scratch test resulting in visible damage. They suggest avoiding this screen protector due to the poor installation and scratch resistance.

Following that, they proceed to demonstrate the installation of a different film screen protector, which goes more smoothly with fewer bubbles. The fingerprint sensor and s pen work well, and the scratch resistance performs decently. This protector is considered suitable for scratch protection, receiving a positive recommendation. Lastly, they test a camera screen protector’s scratch resistance, observing minimal scratches and showing that it fits well with the case.

00:30:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker demonstrates the installation of different screen protectors on a phone. They emphasize the importance of properly adhering the protector for the fingerprint sensor to work. They test the fingerprint sensor, S Pen functionality, touch responsiveness, and scratch resistance of each protector. Some of the protectors had issues with adhesion, bubbles, and scratch resistance. The speaker recommends avoiding certain protectors due to poor adhesion and installation challenges.

00:40:00

In this segment of the video, the first screen protector is showcased, highlighting that its adhesive does not stick well resulting in lifting issues. The second screen protector demonstrated features liquid adhesive and a UV light cure process. After a successful installation, it is revealed that the liquid adhesive method has significantly improved adhesion, making it more secure and durable compared to the first one. The fingerprint sensor and S Pen functionality are tested and proven to work effectively. Additionally, scratch resistance is examined and found to perform well against scratches up to level six. The screen protector is also deemed to be case-friendly and overall provides a good fit with minimal issues.

00:50:00

In this part of the video, the reviewer discusses a liquid adhesive screen protector they recommend despite challenging installation. They highlight scratch protection, S Pen functionality, touch sensitivity, and case compatibility. The installation involves applying liquid adhesive and using a UV light to cure the protector for durability. The final product is seamless with no residue, providing a smooth feel. They also conduct scratch tests, achieving no scratches until level seven, and discuss easy removal if necessary.

01:00:00

In this part of the video, the speaker demonstrates the installation process of two different full adhesive tempered glass screen protectors. The first brand he reviews comes with liquid adhesive that he advises viewers to stay away from due to lack of safety measures and potential risks. The second brand, AmFilm’s ultraviolet glass screen protector, is showcased with a step-by-step guide on how to install it properly using an installation tray, UV light, and adhesive. The demonstration shows the meticulous installation process and highlights the key features of the screen protector, including fingerprint sensor functionality, scratch resistance, case compatibility, and easy removal without leaving residue. The reviewer approves of the AmFilm screen protector and recommends it for its quality and features.

01:10:00

In this segment of the video, the process of applying a screen protector with adhesive is detailed. It involves placing a bridge and guide in position, dispensing the adhesive, applying the screen protector, aligning it with the device, using a UV light to cure the adhesive in different spots, and ensuring proper adherence. The installation is tested with functions like the S Pen and fingerprint recognition, indicating successful performance. The screen protector is evaluated for scratch resistance, showing minimal scratches up to level seven. The White Stone Dome protector receives favorable feedback for its performance and compatibility with cases. The presenter encourages viewers to support the channel and provides a link to purchase the screen protector.

Scroll to Top