The summary of ‘Vigano’s “Excommunication” By Francis Is Invalid (Catholic Teaching)’

This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.

00:00:0000:09:45

The video discusses Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's disputed excommunication by the Vatican, challenging the authority of Pope Francis and highlighting the issue of heresy within the Church. It references Pope St Celestine's teachings regarding heretics and their loss of authority in the church. The speaker accuses Pope Francis of endorsing false worship and non-Christian religions, arguing that traditional Catholic teachings are being suppressed. Pope St. Celestine's actions against the heretic Noorus are examined, emphasizing the loss of authority due to preaching false doctrines. The segment also references a historical denouncement of Noorus as a heretic in Constantinople, supported by popes and councils, leading to the evaluation of authority within the Church. The overarching theme centers on questioning the legitimacy of Pope Francis and the promotion of traditional Catholicism as the true path to salvation.

00:00:00

In this segment of the video, it is discussed how Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò was declared excommunicated by the Vatican, but the declaration was deemed invalid as it was made by what is claimed to be a heretical figure, not a true pope. The transcript cites Pope St Celestine’s teaching that heretics automatically lose authority in the church, implying that leaders like antipope Francis have no power to excommunicate anyone. The passage emphasizes that those preaching heresy are outside the church and cannot remove others from it. The mention of Francis endorsing religious indifferentism is highlighted with supporting documentation.

00:03:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker accuses Pope Francis of participating in false worship and endorsing non-Christian religions, including heretical sects. Francis is criticized for allowing heresies, scandals, and schisms within the Vatican 2 church while acting against those who promote traditional Catholic teachings. The speaker argues that Francis represents a counter church, not the true Catholic Church, and suggests that being a traditional Catholic is the path to salvation. The segment concludes by referencing a debate on sedevacantism to support the criticism of Pope Francis.

00:06:00

In this part of the video, it is discussed that before Noorus’ formal excommunication, Pope St. Celestine supported the faithful in Constantinople who rejected Noorus as a heretic. Celestine taught that heretics like Noorus lose authority from the moment they begin preaching false doctrines, according to an automatic Divine sentence. It is also highlighted that Celestine indicated that Noorus was not a bishop of the church due to his abuse of scripture. These actions and beliefs of Pope St. Celestine are being examined in relation to Noorus’ status and authority within the church.

00:09:00

In this segment of the video, it is mentioned that around 428 or 429, a contesto was posted in Constantinople denouncing Noor’s story as heretic before his formal excommunication. The reaction was praised by popes and councils. A German theologian who died in 1878 quoted them as saying, “an emperor we have, but no bishop.”

Scroll to Top