This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 01:24:24
The YouTube video features comprehensive reviews of various screen protectors and rear camera protectors for the Pixel 8 Pro, highlighting their installation processes, durability, scratch resistance, drop protection, and compatibility with phone features like fingerprint sensors and cameras. Multiple tempered glass and film screen protectors were assessed based on ease of installation, scratch resistance, and drop protection, with some standing out for their performance in tests. The Whit Stone Dome Glass with UV adhesive, amFilm, and Rinky tempered glass protectors received positive recommendations for their durability and compatibility, while other protectors showed limitations in drop tests and installation challenges. The video emphasizes the importance of selecting screen protectors based on individual needs, such as scratch protection or drop protection, and suggests engaging with viewers to share their preferred choices.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video, the content creator tests various screen protectors for the Pixel 8 Pro through scratch and drop tests. They begin by reviewing the amFilm clear tempered glass screen protector, highlighting features like case compatibility and easy installation. The content creator also tests the screen protector’s durability through a drop test, concluding that it survived a 6-foot drop and had standard scratch resistance.
Moving on to the ZAG XTR3 tempered glass screen protector, the installation process was described as difficult, resulting in bubbles on the screen. The fingerprint sensor also had some issues, but overall, the protector was found to be clear with standard touch sensitivity. However, in the drop test, this protector only lasted up to a 3-foot drop, indicating a lower level of durability compared to the amFilm protector.
00:10:00
In this segment of the video, the reviewer discusses three different tempered glass screen protectors.
1. The first screen protector showed good scratch resistance but had issues with installation (bubbles), fingerprint sensor, and drop protection. It was not recommended.
2. The second screen protector had easy installation, good scratch resistance, and worked well with fingerprint sensors. It offered case compatibility but had slightly sharp edges. It passed a 6ft drop test and was recommended.
3. The third screen protector required a UV light for installation. The guide was used to place the protector, and the curing process was shown. It wasn’t mentioned whether it passed or failed any specific tests.
Ultimately, the second screen protector was recommended for its easy installation, scratch resistance, fingerprint sensor compatibility, and drop protection up to 6ft, while the first and third screen protectors had various drawbacks.
00:20:00
In this segment of the video, the narrator demonstrates the installation and testing of different screen protectors.
1. Film screen protector:
– Easy installation without bubbles or dust.
– Slight gap around the screen, likely case compatible.
– Works well with touch and fingerprints.
– Scratch-resistant better than regular film.
– Provides scratch protection but minimal drop protection.
– Recommended for screen scratch protection.
2. Tempered glass screen protector:
– Easy installation and case-friendly.
– Works with fingerprint sensor.
– Standard scratch resistance.
– Limited drop protection, cracks at a 4-foot drop.
3. Whit Stone Dome Glass premium screen protector with UV adhesive:
– Comprehensive installation process involving UV adhesive curing.
– Includes tools for precise installation.
– Offers full coverage, case-friendly, and works with biometric features.
– Minimal drop protection, standard scratch resistance.
Overall, the screen protectors differed in installation complexity, scratch resistance, drop protection, and compatibility with various phone features. Tempered glass protectors offered better scratch resistance, while film protectors provided basic scratch protection. UV adhesive-based protectors like the Whit Stone Dome Glass offered thorough installation but limited durability in drop tests.
00:30:00
In this segment of the video, the process of removing the LED and carefully pressing out the phone from The Jig is described. It highlights cleaning any liquid adhesive, final curing with UV LED, testing with facial recognition and fingerprints, and checking for case compatibility. Two screen protectors are reviewed: one offering full coverage with good scratch resistance and compatibility, receiving a positive recommendation, and the other having installation challenges and poor drop protection, leading to a negative recommendation. The last reviewed screen protector is an anti-glare film, with a challenging installation process but good anti-glare properties, clear touch response, and case compatibility.
00:40:00
In this segment of the video, the reviewer talks about three different screen protectors – film, privacy tempered glass, and tempered glass.
For the film screen protector, installation was frustrating, but it is scratch-resistant and recommended for protecting the screen from scratches. The privacy tempered glass screen protector was clear, not privacy-protected, and didn’t offer good drop protection.
The tempered glass screen protector by Rinky had a good installation process, worked well with indisplay fingerprint sensors, lasted up to a 6-foot drop, and had standard scratch resistance. The reviewer recommended this tempered glass screen protector.
Lastly, the IMB zbk tempered glass screen protector had a decent installation, case compatibility, good touch sensitivity, minimal fingerprint smudges, and good overall protection. It was recommended by the reviewer.
00:50:00
In this part of the video, the YouTuber discusses installing a rear camera protector on a smartphone. The process involves peeling off the protector and aligning it with the camera lens. The YouTuber tests the camera functionality, zoom, and fit inside a case. The rear camera protector is then subjected to a scratch and drop test, with results showing standard tempered glass scratch resistance. The YouTuber proceeds to review another screen protector, discussing the installation process, case compatibility, touch response, and scratch resistance. The video analyzes fingerprint recognition and camera performance with the protector on. The final part includes an assessment of a separate rear camera protector, detailing the installation process and the scratch and drop test results, highlighting the ease of the protector coming off the phone.
01:00:00
In this segment of the video, the narrator tests the scratch resistance and drop protection of different tempered glass screen protectors and rear camera protectors. They highlight the ease of installation, case compatibility, touch sensitivity, fingerprint resistance, and scratch resistance for each product. One screen protector withstood drops of over 8.5 feet without any damage, while another only lasted up to a 2-foot drop. The narrator recommends a specific screen protector for its exceptional performance in both scratch resistance and drop protection tests.
01:10:00
In this segment of the video, several tempered glass screen protectors are reviewed. The first one, despite being case-friendly and working with the in-display fingerprint sensor, failed after a 2-foot drop. It also had issues with fingerprint recognition. The next reviewed privacy tempered glass showed similar issues with fingerprint sensing and scratch resistance, but provided privacy from side views. The last review was for a clear tempered glass protector that fared well with fingerprint recognition and scratch resistance, but failed after a 3-foot drop. Overall, the clear tempered glass protector seemed to be the most favorable option among the three reviewed.
01:20:00
In this segment of the video, the reviewer tests a screen protector’s functionality by checking the face ID, fingerprints, camera, and touchscreen response. The screen protector shows some issues with a slight gap when placed in a case. It undergoes a drop and scratch test, where it only survives a 3-foot drop. The transcript concludes with recommendations for top-performing screen protectors, with one by Sam Korn standing out for its durability and performance across various tests. Some notable alternatives are also mentioned, and viewers are encouraged to share their favorite screen protectors in the comments section.