The summary of ‘Best USB Mics Under $150 – Hyper X Quadcast vs Blue Yeti’

This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.

00:00:0000:12:17

The video primarily compares the HyperX Quadcast and Blue Yeti USB microphones, evaluating their features, performance, and suitability for different recording scenarios like streaming, interviews, and podcasts. The HyperX Quadcast is praised for its compact design, built-in pop filter, and convenient muting function, making it ideal for streamers. It also includes a versatile mount and four audio profiles (cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo), providing broad applicability. In contrast, the Blue Yeti is noted for its bulkiness and lack of integration with some mic arms, though it has accessible controls and requires additional accessories like an aftermarket pop filter and shock mount to achieve optimal sound quality. Despite its high quality, the speaker finds the Blue Yeti less convenient for streaming than the Quadcast. The video concludes by encouraging audience engagement and the use of affiliate links for microphone purchases.

00:00:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker compares the HyperX Quadcast and the Blue Yeti USB microphones. They introduce the Quadcast by highlighting its bright red color shining through its honeycomb mesh, which doubles as a basic but functional pop filter. The Quadcast features a sturdy black shell, a long 9-foot USB cable for flexibility, and a lightweight, compact design making it ideal for streamers. Key features include a versatile mount and a user-friendly mute button on the rubber top that prevents audible pops when tapped. The speaker appreciates the visual cue it offers for muting, aiding in streaming without forgetting to unmute. Moreover, the Quadcast includes four different audio profiles, making it suitable for various uses like interviews and podcasts.

00:03:00

In this part of the video, the speaker explains the different microphone settings, including cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo. Each setting is suited for specific recording scenarios: cardioid for individual use, omnidirectional for group settings, bidirectional for interviews, and stereo for special audio effects. The gain knob is highlighted for its broad range of adjustments, although it may require tweaking. The speaker also discusses the impact of keyboard noise on recordings and suggests using a mic arm for better quality, especially when gaming or streaming. The comparison between the Quadcast and Blue Yeti microphones is also mentioned, noting the latter’s bulkiness and lack of compatibility with some mic arms.

00:06:00

In this segment of the video, the speaker discusses the drawbacks and advantages of using the Blue Yeti microphone, particularly in comparison to the Quadcast mic. Key points include the Blue Yeti’s intrusive presence when mounted on an arm, the issue of visible open screw holes if the stand isn’t used, and the mic’s aesthetically pleasing design but cumbersome size. Important details include the accessibility of buttons and knobs on the Blue Yeti, such as the mute button, pattern switch, gain control, and headphone volume knob. Additionally, the speaker highlights the necessity of an aftermarket pop filter and shock mount for the Blue Yeti to mitigate plosive sounds, adding that the Quadcast includes these features out of the box. The speaker also mentions the different polar patterns available on both microphones, particularly noting the cardioid mode for streamers and voiceovers.

00:09:00

In this segment, the speaker discusses different microphone settings and preferences for specific uses, such as group podcasts or business meetings. They compare two microphones—the Blue Yeti and the HyperX QuadCast—highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. The speaker prefers the QuadCast for its smaller form factor, built-in pop filter, and shock mount, as well as its aesthetic appeal and practical features like muting functionality. While acknowledging that the Blue Yeti is a high-quality mic, they find it bulky and less convenient for streaming needs. The video ends with an invitation to use affiliate links to purchase the microphones and requests viewers to share their experiences.

00:12:00

In this part of the video, the speaker encourages viewers to leave comments, subscribe to the channel, and like the video if they enjoyed it. They end by expressing that they will see the audience in the next video.

Scroll to Top