This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:17:27
The video from "The Average Kitchen" showcases an in-depth, unbiased comparison between two kitchen appliances: the Ninja Combi and the Ninja Speedy. The hosts conduct a head-to-head test by preparing chicken parmesan with pasta and marinara sauce in each device. They highlight differences in setup, liquid requirements, cooking times, temperatures, and ease of use. The Ninja Speedy, which has been used regularly in their kitchen, offers a deeper pan and requires more liquid, while the Ninja Combi, reviewed more recently, uses a two-tray system. Despite these differences, both appliances achieved similar results in cooking the dish, with minor variations in the crunchiness and juiciness of the chicken. Additionally, the video addresses practical concerns such as cleaning difficulties, appliance sizes, capacity, and costs—$199 for the Speedy and $229 for the Combi. The presenters conclude by discussing the considerations of countertop space and family size, with one favoring less countertop clutter and the other preferring a larger cooking surface. The video ends with a call to action for viewer engagement.
00:00:00
In this segment of the video from “The Average Kitchen,” the hosts discuss the ongoing debate between the Ninja Combi and the Ninja Speedy cookers. They plan to perform a head-to-head comparison by preparing chicken parmesan with pasta and marinara sauce using each appliance. The hosts mention how frequently they use these devices in their kitchen, emphasizing that the Ninja Speedy has been used regularly for an extended period, while the Ninja Combi was reviewed more recently. They describe the setup for each cooker: the Combi uses two trays, with the pasta, marinara, and chicken broth mixture placed on the bottom tray, while the Speedy uses a deeper pan and requires more liquid. The main difference they highlight is the configuration of the trays in each device. They proceed to prepare the ingredients and note the differences in liquid requirements and setup between the two appliances.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the presenters prepare two chicken breasts by dredging them in flour, egg wash, and panko breadcrumbs seasoned with salt and pepper. They then begin the cooking process using two different appliances: the Ninja Speedy and another device referred to as “comi.” They set the Ninja Speedy to 375°F for 15 minutes on rapid cook mode and the other device to 390°F for 18 minutes.
They discuss their skepticism about cooking chicken thoroughly in such a short time, emphasizing the importance of checking the internal temperature for safety. They clarify that they are not affiliated with any brands, providing unbiased reviews. As the cooking nears completion, they humorously acknowledge their excitement about the results and suggest adding sauce and mozzarella cheese to the cooked chicken. They also note a practical difficulty with stirring pasta in one of the devices due to the placement of the chicken tray. Finally, they reveal the cooked chicken, which appears satisfactory.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the presenter discusses preparing a dish with marinara sauce and cheese, acknowledging the future hassle of cleaning the melted cheese. Despite this, they emphasize how tasty the dish looks and give the pasta a stir for personal satisfaction. The presenter reflects on a conversation with Jamie and shares a sentiment about needing to make chicken parm for their kids. They then check the cooking progress and confirm that the food is almost done, with temperature readings ensuring it’s cooked properly. The Speedy grill is highlighted for its efficiency and easy cheese cleanup, demonstrated by some cheese dripping onto the pasta. Finally, the presenter and Jamie agree on the appealing look of the finished dish before removing it from the oven.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the presenter discusses the differences in cooking times and temperatures between two kitchen appliances: the Speedy and the Comi. The Speedy had a preheat time of 9 minutes whereas the Comi took 5 and 1/2 minutes. Despite the differences in temperatures—Speedy at 375°F and Comi at 390°F—both cooked the chicken parm dishes to an almost identical finish time. The presenter notes slight differences in the crispiness of the panko crust, with the Comi’s being crunchier and the Speedy’s slightly juicier. Additionally, he observes that marinara and cheese can reduce the crunchiness of the chicken. Lastly, he and Jamie confirm that the pasta cooked with each appliance has a very similar texture and quality.
00:12:00
In this part of the video, the speaker compares two products, highlighting their similarities and slight differences. They discuss measurements, capacity, and practicality for a family of four. The Ninja Speedy has an 8×8 inch overall size and a 10×10 inch reservoir that is 5 inches deep, whereas the combi tray is under 12×12 inches overall and 10×12 inches in size but only 2 inches deep. Price points are also compared, with the Ninja Speedy priced at $199 and the combi at $229. Additionally, the speaker notes the clearance needed to open the Speedy (20 inches) versus the combi’s height (13 inches), which could be a consideration for countertop space.
00:15:00
In this part of the video, the speaker discusses the difficulties of cleaning certain elements of a kitchen appliance that Jamie recently attempted to clean more deeply. The conversation highlights how some parts are almost impossible to clean without engineering skills, while mentioning which components can be safely cleaned in a dishwasher. The speaker also shares that the appliance appears very clean because it hasn’t been used much, given that they own various kitchen products. They then deliberate on which appliance to choose based on family size and storage preferences. Jamie, having a smaller family, finds the appliance perfectly sized and easy to store, favoring no countertop clutter. The speaker, having a larger family, prefers the appliance with a greater cooking surface area for proteins. The video concludes with a call to action for the audience to share their preferences, subscribe, and stay engaged.