This summary of the video was created by an AI. It might contain some inaccuracies.
00:00:00 – 00:09:06
Tom the Tech Chap compares the performance and features of the Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chips in the Samsung S24 series. He highlights that models in the UK and Europe utilize the Exynos chip, whereas all US models and the S24 Ultra globally use Snapdragon. Benchmark and real-world tests show that the Snapdragon consistently outperforms Exynos, particularly in tasks like 4K video export and gaming without ray tracing. However, Exynos demonstrates better FPS in prolonged gaming and ray tracing scenarios. Despite these gains, Exynos models experience higher surface temperatures and greater battery drain. Tom concludes that while Exynos has improved, Snapdragon remains superior, and he invites viewers to share their experiences and thoughts on the matter.
00:00:00
In this part of the video, Tom the Tech Chap discusses the differences between the Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chips in the Samsung S24 series, focusing on their performance and features. He notes that in the UK and Europe, the regular S24 and S24 Plus models use the Exynos chip, while all models in the US use Snapdragon. The Ultra model uses Snapdragon globally. Historically, Exynos chips have lagged behind Snapdragon in performance, battery life, and camera quality. Tom conducts several benchmark tests, including the 3D Mark Wildlife extreme stress test and a Solar Bay stress test, revealing that the Snapdragon consistently outperforms Exynos. He also compares their core architectures and RAM/storage configurations, finding minimal differences in multi-core performance. Despite these similarities, Snapdragon takes the lead in all the tests conducted so far.
00:03:00
In this part of the video, the presenter conducts a series of performance tests comparing the Snapdragon and Exynos chips. In a synthetic benchmark, the Snapdragon outperforms the Exynos slightly. For a real-world test, they export a 4K video using Premiere Rush and observe a significant speed difference, with the Snapdragon completing the task three times faster initially. After some troubleshooting and restarts, they notice the Exynos chip still underperforms, possibly due to better software optimization for Snapdragon. Additionally, while playing War Thunder, both chips initially maintain good FPS without ray tracing, but over time, the Exynos performs 5-10 FPS better. When ray tracing is enabled, the Exynos chip excels, indicating better performance in specific scenarios involving ray tracing.
00:06:00
In this part of the video, the presenter compares Samsung’s S24 Plus with the Exynos chip to the S24 Ultra with the Snapdragon processor. Using a laser thermometer, they measure the surface temperature and find the Plus model to be about 3° higher. In terms of gaming, the Exynos performs better in War Thunder while performance in PUBG is similar. AI features seem to manage equally well on both chips, although the S24 Plus uses significantly more battery despite having a slightly smaller capacity. The presenter notes that those outside the US have no choice but to use the Exynos version unless importing from the US, which may cause compatibility issues. They believe the Snapdragon is somewhat superior, especially since it is included in the Ultra model globally. The presenter expresses a sense of being shortchanged with the Exynos in the UK but acknowledges that Exynos has nearly caught up to Snapdragon. Finally, they encourage viewers to share their experiences and thoughts in the comments.
00:09:00
In this part of the video, the host concludes by expressing enthusiasm and promising to return for future discussions on the tech chat.